GOVERNANCE
68
Bursa Malaysia •
Annual Report 2015
b. Annual assessment and its criteria in respect of the
Board and Board Committees, Directors and Board
Committee members
15
The NRC carries out the Board Effectiveness Evaluation
(“BEE”) exercise annually. An external consultant is engaged
every three years to assist the NRC in this assessment,
with the last one conducted by an external consultant in
2014. In September 2015, the NRC approved the approach
for the conduct of BEE 2014/2015 to be facilitated by the
Company Secretaries and reviewed the questionnaires for
the BEE 2014/2015, which comprised a Board and Board
Committee Effectiveness Assessment, Directors and Board
Committee members’ Self and Peer Assessment (“SPA”), as
well as a 360 Degree Assessment by members of senior
management.
The effectiveness of the Board is assessed in the areas of the
Board’s responsibilities and composition, meeting process,
administration and conduct, interaction and communication
with Management and stakeholders and Board
engagement, as well as the effectiveness of the Chairman
and the CEO. The Board, through the Governance and
Regulatory Committee Effectiveness Assessment, examines
the respective Governance and Regulatory Committees,
including their respective Chairmen, to ascertain whether
their functions and duties are effectively discharged in
accordance with their respective TOR. The effectiveness of
the Board Committees is assessed in terms of structure and
processes, accountabilities and responsibilities, as well as
the effectiveness of the Chairmen of the respective Board
Committees.
The NRC also approved the performance criteria for the
assessment of individual Directors through the Directors’
SPA questionnaire under four main areas, i.e. Board
dynamics and participation, competency and capability,
exercise of independent judgement and objectivity with
integrity, as well as contribution and performance.
The SPA for the Board Committee members is similar to the
Directors’ SPA,which is intended to assess their contribution,
performance, calibre and personality in relation to the skills,
experience and other qualities they bring to the Board/Board
Committees. The SPA process also examines the ability of
each Board or Committee member to give input at meetings
and to demonstrate a high level of professionalism and
integrity in the decision-making process. It also takes into
account the ability of each individual Director and Board
Committee member to exercise independent judgement
and demonstrate objectivity and clarity of thought on issues
during deliberations at meetings, provide logical honest
opinion, and offer practical and realistic advice to the Board
and/or Committees’ discussions.
The NRC also sought feedback from the members of senior
management via the issuance of 360 Degree Assessment
questionnaires in conjunction with the BEE 2014/2015
exercise. The Management’s feedback/observations on the
Board’s role, and the extent/effectiveness of partnership/
collaboration between the Board and Management in
certain focus areas or support functions are useful for the
Board’s consideration in enhancing its overall effectiveness.
The NRC had in October 2015 reviewed the outcome of
the BEE 2014/2015, and considered each of the feedback/
comments given by the Board/Board Committee members
for the Board’s improvement. The NRC also considered the
proposed action plans for areas which had been identified
for improvement. In November 2015, the Board resolved
to adopt the BEE 2014/2015 results and the action plans
for enhancements by the Board and the respective Board
Committees, as recommended by the NRC. The average
rating of at least 3.50 and above on a 5-point scale in
respect of the performance criteria indicated the Board’s
consensus that each of the Directors’ level of performance
was either satisfactory or good, and that they had also
met the performance criteria in the prescribed areas of
assessment.
Each Board member was provided with his/her own
individual results of the Directors’ SPA together with a peer
average rating on each area of assessment for personal
information and further development. In December 2015,
the Regulatory Committee members who are non-Directors
of Bursa Malaysia were also provided with the results of the
respective Committee Effectiveness Assessments including
the Committee members’ feedback, the individual results of
the Committees’ SPA together with a peer average rating
on each area of assessment for personal information and
further development.
The results of these assessments form one of the basis of
the NRC’s recommendations to the Board for the re-election
of Directors at the next AGM, and the re-appointment of
Board Committee members for the ensuing term of two
years from 1 July 2016.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
STATEMENT
15 Paragraph 15.08A(3)(c) of the MMLR